Skip to main content

New GCSEs

Having just read this article about the new GCSEs that we will be blessed with come September 2015 I am highly intrigued to how they will pan out.

Yes perhaps it is good for fourteen-sixteen year olds to read a Shakespeare play and a 19th Century novel - in fact I think that's a really good aspect of the new GCSEs - but the focus on examinations is something that I do not agree with. As someone who attends a competitive comprehensive I felt enough pressure as it was to do exams and I still do as I am finishing my A Levels. The coursework aspects of the courses I took - particularly as someone who found essay writing particularly difficult back then - were a welcome relief and a chance to develop and engage in essay writing. I understand that students will do 'mock essays' but this only increases pressure on students to actually do them - since they won't have 'official' deadlines - and more pressure on teachers to be constantly working on and improving the students writing styles since the level of competition will be much higher at the end of the two years.

Furthermore even as it is students show a lot of negativity towards exam texts and as an A Level English Literature student I can safely say that a 19th Century novel was difficult to study - and I'm someone who reads a lot! The level of enthusiasm a teacher would have to engage to get twenty to thirty fifteen year olds to invest themselves in a novel like Jane Eyre would be pretty high.

I'm not one to be skeptical but I reckon these new GCSEs are going to be incredibly challenging for family life, for the students' well-being and on the teachers as well.

Comments

  1. The focus on exams is something that astounds me, the people making these decisions are people who have had it pretty easy in school, they are very intelligent people! However intellect seems to have gotten in the way of common sense and understanding.
    Personally I was always a high achiever, until GCSE, yes I came out with mostly A grades, but it was a lot of hard work, and it was the exams that brought down my grades.

    My prime example is media, I have always gotten A* grade coursework, but then I came out with a D in the exam giving me B, which broke me, because I knew the content, but my essay writing and long answers are something I find incredibly difficult especially under a time constraint.

    Yes, I think exams are the only way you can test some subjects, but I think that they should have a coursework element to allow those who don't find exams easy to at least give them a fighting chance of getting the grade the deserve.

    But I completely agree with you about 19th century novels, it's hard enough getting those who have chosen to do english literature to get excited about it, but kids who aren't interested and feel they are being forced into qualifications are not going to even try.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Be skeptical. Just don't be cynical.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

"Teens don't read"

Earlier today Maureen Johnson pointed out that the view of "teens don't read" in the UK is deeply entrenched (which is a word that I now love  and had never heard before). As a teenager in the UK, the stigma around reading seems to be - to me - it's "uncool", it's "geeky", there "aren't any good books out there". I think the fact that a lot of teenagers in British schools are exposed to older literature or, perhaps, not that popular literature in lessons and forced into over-analysing and spending countless hours on 'what the author meant'. A point that was raised in this twitter discussion was that people didn't want to be seen reading, or didn't want to be seen reading certain books. It's made me realise that I never   ever ever  see people reading in the older years in my school ( ever ). Perhaps the odd year 7 (12 year old) or year 8 (13 year old) will read, but - from experience - they will probably be ...

The concept of 'okayness'

Something I've noticed through both personal experience and observing other individuals is how human beings deal with the concept of being 'okay'. Generally we all have good things and bad things going on in their lives, take me for example: bad - back pain, medicine; good - family, friends, home, life, food, money... good stuff happening and change (change is an 'okay' right now rather than a 'not okay'). I happen to think that my life is  okay at the moment because, for me, the good stuff out ways the bad stuff by a milestone. Throughout a day I may become not okay but on the whole I am - on the whole I'm happy. I have noticed though, through reflection and looking at others, that we almost have this desire... this tendency to want to point at the 'not okay' bits of out lives and make them of a higher importance than our 'okay' bits. If I'm having an average day it can much more easily become a bad day than a good because I reme...

Girls on YouTube

You know something that is really  annoying me lately: slimey YouTube comments. I posted a video, admittedly yes because I knew it would get attention because I'm a girl talking about Skyrim, wearing a vest top because that happened to be what I was wearing at the time and I've had really... objectifying comments. It's not even as if some of these comments are commenting on my looks, they're commenting on my body. I don't even care if guys think when they see a girl in a low-cut top "ooh, boobs!" but they don't (usually) voice this in person, so why should they be allowed to do it on the internet? It annoys me greatly; imagine if I was two years younger and had done the same thing? It would put me in a very vulnerable situation, and it still does in a way. I want people to view my content because they like what comes out of my mouth, not because I'm female and film in casual clothing. I've even had someone accuse me of angling my camera so ...