Skip to main content

New GCSEs

Having just read this article about the new GCSEs that we will be blessed with come September 2015 I am highly intrigued to how they will pan out.

Yes perhaps it is good for fourteen-sixteen year olds to read a Shakespeare play and a 19th Century novel - in fact I think that's a really good aspect of the new GCSEs - but the focus on examinations is something that I do not agree with. As someone who attends a competitive comprehensive I felt enough pressure as it was to do exams and I still do as I am finishing my A Levels. The coursework aspects of the courses I took - particularly as someone who found essay writing particularly difficult back then - were a welcome relief and a chance to develop and engage in essay writing. I understand that students will do 'mock essays' but this only increases pressure on students to actually do them - since they won't have 'official' deadlines - and more pressure on teachers to be constantly working on and improving the students writing styles since the level of competition will be much higher at the end of the two years.

Furthermore even as it is students show a lot of negativity towards exam texts and as an A Level English Literature student I can safely say that a 19th Century novel was difficult to study - and I'm someone who reads a lot! The level of enthusiasm a teacher would have to engage to get twenty to thirty fifteen year olds to invest themselves in a novel like Jane Eyre would be pretty high.

I'm not one to be skeptical but I reckon these new GCSEs are going to be incredibly challenging for family life, for the students' well-being and on the teachers as well.

Comments

  1. The focus on exams is something that astounds me, the people making these decisions are people who have had it pretty easy in school, they are very intelligent people! However intellect seems to have gotten in the way of common sense and understanding.
    Personally I was always a high achiever, until GCSE, yes I came out with mostly A grades, but it was a lot of hard work, and it was the exams that brought down my grades.

    My prime example is media, I have always gotten A* grade coursework, but then I came out with a D in the exam giving me B, which broke me, because I knew the content, but my essay writing and long answers are something I find incredibly difficult especially under a time constraint.

    Yes, I think exams are the only way you can test some subjects, but I think that they should have a coursework element to allow those who don't find exams easy to at least give them a fighting chance of getting the grade the deserve.

    But I completely agree with you about 19th century novels, it's hard enough getting those who have chosen to do english literature to get excited about it, but kids who aren't interested and feel they are being forced into qualifications are not going to even try.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Be skeptical. Just don't be cynical.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

"Teens don't read"

Earlier today Maureen Johnson pointed out that the view of "teens don't read" in the UK is deeply entrenched (which is a word that I now love  and had never heard before). As a teenager in the UK, the stigma around reading seems to be - to me - it's "uncool", it's "geeky", there "aren't any good books out there". I think the fact that a lot of teenagers in British schools are exposed to older literature or, perhaps, not that popular literature in lessons and forced into over-analysing and spending countless hours on 'what the author meant'. A point that was raised in this twitter discussion was that people didn't want to be seen reading, or didn't want to be seen reading certain books. It's made me realise that I never   ever ever  see people reading in the older years in my school ( ever ). Perhaps the odd year 7 (12 year old) or year 8 (13 year old) will read, but - from experience - they will probably be ...

The people I have met through ink

I read somewhere once that one of the reasons books are so great is that one can pick them up a second time and feel how you did, or remember where you were the first time you picked it up and opened it. I stand by this idea as to one of the reasons I love reading so much. I am perusing the wonderful words of Ali Smith's The Accidental for my level 1 module 'Introduction to Narrative' and whilst this module is all very technical (and trust me, I do love that!) I am really enjoying reading a novel where the characterisation leaves a bitter sweet taste in my mouth and when I close my eyes all I can see is Amber; how she looks, how she dresses, how she smells... I love that. I love that I can read 200 pages or so of one novel and suddenly there is this person inside of my head and I can't get her out. Not so long ago I read R. J. Anderson's Nomad (the second in the Swift series) and I was brought back to why I adore fantasy so much. I felt like I wanted to fly, and...

Ask FML

Ask FM infuriates me. I'm not going to take a moral high-ground and say I've never asked a question on it, because that would be lying but it still makes me angry. (Note that you can in fact dislike something that you have partaken in previously...) I can understand the appeal to both asking and answering questions - yeah, it can get some good conversation going. What I don't understand is that those two people could have that perfectly civilised conversation about all those deep and meaningful questions without the anonymity. Furthermore, why does someone immediately think "oh, I'm bored I KNOW let's post a link to ask.fm on my facebook/twitter page"? If you're bored go and do talk to people (text, phone, family, skype DO IT), read a book, make a video, write a blog post. Why ask people ask you questions? I just... I guess I don't get it. I have seen people horrendously bullied on formspring and ask fm and yet they continue to allow themselv...